I guess you need more than jobs
after all for shared prosperity and an end to the recession. Today the OregonCenter for Public Policy published a report which draws several disturbing conclusions about changes in poverty –
and jobs – in Oregon .
The official poverty line was
devised in 1960 and is an overly optimistic estimate of what it takes to make
ends meet in 2013. But with that
benchmark, families in Oregon
(with children and at least one parent working full-time all year) have
increased from less than 5% of families in 2006 to more than 6% in 2011 – more
than a 20% increase in five years.
Job vs. no-job is not the primary
determinant of poverty among Oregon
families. In most families in poverty –
69% - at least one parent is working either full time or less than full time.
The report said, “Full-time work
was less likely to be enough for a parent to lift her or his family above the
poverty line in 2011 than it was in 2010 and in 2009, the year the recession
officially ended.” The percentage of
children in poverty-stricken families increased by about 24% from 2009 to 2011.
In a final
graph, the report illustrates the stark differences in poverty rates between
working single mother households and working single father households. Unsurprisingly, single moms fare much worse
than single dads.
Here are
the unfiltered conclusions of the report:
Second, lawmakers can better fund work supports
for poor working families. For example, the Employment Related Day Care
program, which subsidizes child care for low-income working families, is so
poorly funded that eligible parents must first be on a waiting list.
Third, lawmakers can better fund the Job
Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) program, an employment and training
program for very poor families with dependent children.
The majority of families with children living
in poverty in Oregon
are working families. Oregon
can do more to help ensure that work pays for families who are poor despite
their work efforts.
No comments:
Post a Comment